The New
York Times recently turned its eye to the apparent
plight of California’s Republican Party,
suggesting, as commentators in California have been for years now, that the GOP
is in terminal decline in the Golden State.
Their evidence is largely electoral, and the party’s abject failure to
win any state-wide office in 2010 is the most widely-cited example of this
supposed decline.
Steve Schmidt, one of the GOP’s more
discontented consultants, told the Times
that “The institution of the California Republican Party...has effectively
collapsed. It doesn’t do any of the
things that a political party should do.
It doesn’t register voters. It
doesn’t recruit candidates. It doesn’t
raise money. The Republican Party in the
state institutionally has become a small ideological club that is basically in
the business of hunting out heretics”.
Schmidt is obviously wrong in suggesting
that the California GOP is somehow anomalous within the broader Republican tent
in its McCarthyite witch-hunts, whether ideological, religious, or racial. But I think he’s also off-base in his
assessment of the GOP’s power in California.
Because the implication that shrinking
numerical support for the state GOP equates to the party wielding less influence
is erroneous. I don’t know when there’s
ever been a period when Republicans exerted so much influence and control over
California’s politics. Nagourney, the Times article’s author, suggests that
California “has become a national symbol of fiscal turmoil and dysfunction”. That we are viewed in this way, and that our
state has in fact become utterly un-governable, is a sign of the Republican
Party’s great influence, not of its decline.
California’s failure is the GOP’s victory, and if the party was routed
by the voters in 2010, the year was actually a great victory for the economic
ideology behind the party.
What is happening in California today—the
de-funding of schools and colleges, the shuttering of public spaces, the deregulation
of industry, the creeping privatisation of our universities, the growth of economic
inequality, the maintenance of loopholes for the wealthy and for corporations—is
the implementation of the state Republican Party’s platform.
We elected a Democratic governor to
office who has made austerity—that is, the Republicans’ primary political plank—his
watchword where not his ideology. Austerity,
in the hands of people on a search and destroy mission in our state’s public
sphere, is indiscriminate dynamiting masquerading as sober-minded
accounting.
This Democratic governor, instead of
placing the welfare of the Californians first, embraced his erstwhile opponent
Meg Whitman’s focus on the budget. He
has, in fact, managed a couple of balanced budgets. But they’ve been balanced, fiscal
conservatives and economic fundamentalists will be happy to know, at the
express expense if not the outright butchery of schools, colleges,
universities, and other public institutions which provide for the welfare of a
broad spectrum of Californians.
Why does this occur? Because the threshold for making decisions
about revenue is so high that the Republicans exercise a veto over virtually
any decision dealing with finance (one of Proposition 13’s many legacies). If the party had an affirmative programme,
this might still leave them out in the cold.
But because their ideology calls for the dismantling of the public
sector, thereby defaulting power over labour, consumption, education, environmental
protection, energy regulation, and the provision of social support and services
to the private sector. There might be
things that the private sector is good at, but making calls about the welfare
of the majority and self regulating are not amongst its virtues.
The point is, however, that the
Republican Party’s veto suits them very well.
Instead of registering voters, it registers itself with irresponsible
corporate interests. Instead of
recruiting candidates it deploys paid-up fundamentalists. Instead of raising money, it coasts on that
of its paymasters.
Nagourney quoted California Republican
Party Chairman Tom Del Beccaro as saying, “The Democrats are in a lot of
trouble because they’ve had the governorship, the Assembly and the Senate, and
the budget is way out of balance; unemployment is third-highest in the nation. They don’t have any plans related to those
problems, other than higher taxes...And the issues are coming our way because
the biggest issues are budget and taxes”.
This is the point at which responsible
journalism would involve the author of the article qualifying this combination
of misstatement of fact and mangling of the argument by providing some information
to readers. The Democrats might have the
numerical advantage in the Assembly and Senate, but through the unconscionable exercise
of their undemocratic veto, the Republicans control both chambers. Neither have the Republicans ever had a
better ally in the Governor’s office than Jerry Brown, who has never been big
on public investment.
“Higher taxes”, as Del Beccaro well
knows, don’t constitute a plan. The plan
involves setting standards, allocating resources, investing, and making calls
about what policy changes are in the interest of California. And yes, many of those things cost money, not
surprisingly, given that our state is increasingly more populous and diverse,
that our demographics are shifting, and our relationship with our environment
changing. But Del Beccaro and his witless
oath-swearing, pledge-taking colleagues have deprived state government of the
ability to invest in the state’s human capital.
They have denied state government the flexibility that should characterise
its engagement with moral quandaries and demographic dilemmas.
The Republicans are fond of calling high
speed rail—our state’s lone effort to make some kind of investment which will aid
our quest for sustainable living, generate employment, and promote the free
movement of people and goods—“The Train to Nowhere”. It’s characteristically catchy, typically
disingenuous, and classically declensionist.
I’m worried that high speed rail will turn into an albatross around the
state’s neck. Not because there’s any
inherent problem with the plan. But because
the Republican Party, with its immense influence and total immunity from
culpability in our state’s bizarre political system, is hell-bent on making it
one. And this sums the state GOP up very
well: the exercise of enormous power through dishonest means which exempt them
from all responsibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment